All Women Should Be Offered Midwife-led Care
Midwives are primary providers of care for childbearing women around the world. However, there is a lack of synthesised information to establish whether there are differences in morbidity and mortality, effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes between midwife-led and other models of care.
To compare midwife-led models of care with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants.
We included 11trials (12,276 women). Women who had midwife-led models of care were less likely to experience antenatal hospitalisation, risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.99), the use of regional analgesia (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91), episiotomy (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88), and instrumental delivery (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96) and were more likely to experience no intrapartum analgesia/anaesthesia (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.29), spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06), to feel in control during labour and childbirth (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.30), attendance at birth by a known midwife (RR 7.84, 95% CI 4.15 to 14.81) and initiate breastfeeding (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.76). In addition, women who were randomised to receive midwife-led care were less likely to experience fetal loss before 24 weeks' gestation (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97), and their babies were more likely to have a shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference -2.00, 95% CI -2.15 to -1.85). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for overall fetal loss/neonatal death (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00), or fetal loss/neonatal death of at least 24 weeks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.53).
All women should be offered midwife-led models of care and women should be encouraged to ask for this option.
Plain language summary
Midwife-led care confers benefits for pregnant women and their babies and is recommended.
In many parts of the world, midwives are the primary providers of care for childbearing women. Elsewhere it may be medical doctors or family physicians who have the main responsibility for care, or the responsibility may be shared. The underpinning philosophy of midwife-led care is normality and being cared for by a known and trusted midwife during labour. There is an emphasis on the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum intervention. Some models of midwife-led care provide a service through a team of midwives sharing a caseload, often called 'team' midwifery. Another model is 'caseload midwifery', where the aim is to offer greater continuity of caregiver throughout the episode of care. Caseload midwifery aims to ensure that the woman receives all her care from one midwife or her/his practice partner. By contrast, medical-led models of care are where an obstetrician or family physician is primarily responsible for care. In shared-care models, responsibility is shared between different healthcare professionals.
The review of midwife-led care covered midwives providing care antenatally, during labour and postnatally. This was compared with models of medical-led care and shared care, and identified 11 trials, involving 12,276 women. Midwife-led care was associated with several benefits for mothers and babies, and had no identified adverse effects. The main benefits were a reduced risk of losing a baby before 24 weeks. Also during labour, there was a reduced use of regional analgesia, with fewer episiotomies or instrumental births. Midwife-led care also increased the woman's chance of being cared for in labour by a midwife she had got to know. It also increased the chance of a spontaneous vaginal birth and initiation of breastfeeding. In addition, midwife-led care led to more women feeling they were in control during labour. There was no difference in risk of a mother losing her baby after 24 weeks. The review concluded that all women should be offered midwife-led models of care.
Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2.
Finding a Midwife in Maine
There are many midwives currently working with families here in central Maine, both CNMs (Certified Nurse Midwives) who attend births in hospitals, and CPMs (Certified Professional Midwives0 who attend births at home. There is also one independent, free-standing birth center in Maine, staffed by midwives: The Birth House, in Bridgton.
Waterville Women's Care
Rights at Maine General, Waterville Campus
Central Maine Medical Center OB/GYN
Rights at CMMC
Women's Health Associates
Rights at St. Mary's Hospital
The Women's Center
Rights at Miles Memorial Hospital
Mid Coast Medical Group
Rights at Mid Coast Hospital
[This group appears to include several offices at different locations with different phone numbers.]
Cathy Heffernan, CNM
Winthrop Family Practice
Rights at Maine General, Augusta Campus
Heather Stamler, CPM
Christine Yentes, CPM
Morning Star Midwifery
Donna Broderick, CPM
Ellie Daniels, CPM
Mother Bloom Midwifery
Anna Fernandez, Traditional Homebirth Midwife
The Pregnancy Support Center
Northern Sun Family Health Care
Sarah Ackerly, ND, CPM Topsham
Birch Moon Midwifery
Holly Arrends, CPM
Casco Bay Midwifery
Schyla St. Laurent, CPM
Open Circle Midwifery Services
Robin Doolittle, CPM
Deirdre Sulka/Meister, CPM
Sacopee Valley Birth Services
Brenda Surabian, CPM and
Lindsay Johnston, CPM
To search for more midwives in Maine, go to the Midwives of Maine website or the Find a Midwife section of the American College of Nurse-Midwives website.
Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine